Eating Plants to Mitigate the Impacts of Climate Change on Tundra?
By Isabel C. Barrio, Lead of the UArctic Thematic Network on Herbivory, Associate Professor, Agricultural University of Iceland and David Hik, Professor, Simon Fraser University and Bruce C. Forbes, Professor, University of Lapland and Ingibjörg Svala Jónsdóttir, Professor, University of Iceland and Elina Kaarlejärvi, Postdoctoral Researcher, University of Helsinki and Mikhail V. Kozlov, Adjunct Professor, University of Turku and Eeva M. Soininen, Researcher, UiT The Arctic University of Norway and Henni Ylänne, Postdoctoral Researcher, Lund University and University of Eastern Finland and Maria Väisänen, Postdoctoral Researcher, University of Oulu
Hundreds of species of plant-eating mammals, birds and insects – known as herbivores – inhabit the Arctic tundra. Some of these are vital for local communities and northern cultures, including domesticated reindeer and sheep, and hunted caribou, muskox, ptarmigan and geese.
Herbivores also contribute to the benefits that tundra ecosystems provide to people, the so-called ecosystem services. By feeding selectively on plants, trampling on plants and soils, and depositing urine and faeces, herbivores affect vegetation, biodiversity, productivity, energy flows, and nutrient cycling. In the case of reindeer and caribou, the impact on vegetation can be so significant that grazing differences along national borders or between different islands or pastures with different animal densities can be captured by satellite images.
The rapid climate warming in Arctic regions is affecting herbivores in many ways. Warming may lead to shortage of food during warmer winters when freezing rains lock vegetation under ice layers, or to increased food availability during longer and warmer summers. At a circumpolar scale, climate warming has triggered the expansion of trees and tall shrubs to and within tundra, but herbivores may also buffer this vegetation expansion in the treeless tundra. However, the impacts of herbivores and their effectiveness to counteract warming-induced changes in vegetation vary regionally and depend on many site-specific factors such as the type and abundance of herbivores.
The UArctic Thematic Network on Herbivory, with partners from nine UArctic member universities, explores the role of herbivory throughout the Arctic. Our initial studies assessed why some areas host a few herbivore species while others are home to diverse species assemblages. We found that herbivore diversity relates to plant productivity and the number of predatory species. If climate warming continues to increase productivity and the northward movement of boreal predators, diverse tundra herbivore assemblages may become more similar.
We have also quantified patterns of a neglected group of tundra herbivores, namely insects. Although insects consume little plant biomass in tundra (typically <1%), they are found nearly everywhere. In addition, insect herbivory increases with summer temperatures, suggesting that plant damage by insects as well as insect outbreaks will likely increase in a warmer Arctic.
Currently, we are synthesizing information about where and how the effects of herbivores on Arctic vegetation have been studied. This project will identify strengths and weaknesses in our current knowledge, which is relevant to local communities and their livelihoods (read more in the article on the CHARTER project, in which the Thematic Network is a partner). As rapid changes are occurring in the Arctic, we need a better understanding of the role of herbivory and its dependencies on site-specific factors to adjust management strategies and to preserve ecosystem services and biodiversity of diverse terrestrial Arctic environments. Coordinated herbivory research will allow for more robust predictions about the consequences of the rapid and ongoing changes in this region.
Related
Table of Contents
-
Letter from the President
By Lars Kullerud
-
Editorial
By Outi Snellman
-
UArctic – an Indispensable Arctic Actor
By Annika Saarikko
-
Growing Connections Between Scotland and UArctic
By Richard Lochhead
-
Canada’s Vision for Arctic Youth Empowerment
By David Sproule
-
In Memoriam: Oliver William (Bill) Heal, 1934-2021
-
Arctic Philanthropist: Interview with Frederik Paulsen
By Hannele Palviainen
-
Interviews of UArctic Board members: Anne Husebekk
By Arne O. Holm
-
Interviews of UArctic Board members: Evon Peter
By Arne O. Holm
-
Interviews of UArctic Board members: Mikhail Pogodaev
By Arne O. Holm
-
Becoming Circumpolar: Reflections on Origins and Outcomes
By Amanda Graham
-
New Directions in Circumpolar Studies: Launching the Læra Institute
By Anthony Speca, Anthony Speca, Heather Nicol and Gary Wilson
-
UArctic at a Glance
-
Arena for the Gap Analysis of the Existing Arctic Science Co-Operations
By Hanna Lappalainen and Stephany Mazon
-
North-Eastern Federal University: Sustainable Development & Bridging the Arctic and Asia
By Vladimir Suzdalov
-
UArctic-HIT Training Centre: A Bridge Between Arctic and Chinese Universities
By Yi-Fan Li
-
14 Years of Arctic Indigenous Collaboration with BEBO – How Has It Been?
By Marina Falevitch and Mika Aromäki
-
Collecting Knowledge from Finnmark’s Plateau to Japan
By Amanda Åsberg
-
Arctic Makes: Observations, Lessons, and Solutions from the Geographic Periphery
By Svetlana Usenyuk-Kravchuk and Timo Jokela
-
CHARTER – Towards a Broader Understanding of Arctic Complexity
By Philip Burgess
-
A Sense of Home Across the Arctic Through Wild Foods
By Harmony Jade Wayner
-
Improved Water Access and Sanitary Conditions in Rural Arctic Settlements
By Pernille Erland Jensen and Aaron Dotson
-
The Arctic Yearbook: An Open Access Platform for Arctic Studies and Research
By Lassi Heininen and Heather Exner-Pirot
-
The Battle of the Arctic: To Drill or Not to Drill?
By Angelina Giordano
-
6G as a Universal Connectivity Provider in the 2030s
By Harri Saarnisaari, Hanna Saarela and Marja-Matinmikko-Blue